Cancer Expert Counters Reckless Claims That Hormonal Milk Is Safe
4 Comments
From Organics Consumer Assoication
The Cancer Prevention Coalition is criticizing a widely publicized recent report, “Recombinant Bovine Somatotropin” (rBST) which claims that milk from cows injected with this genetically engineered hormone is safe.The report was authored by eight paid consultants to rBST companies, including Elanco and Monsanto, points out Dr. Samuel S. Epstein, Chairman of the Cancer Prevention Coalition. “All of these consultants were paid for their so-called ‘safety assessments,’” he says.
The hormone rBST is injected in about 20% of U.S. dairy cows to increase milk production. While the industry claims that the hormone is safe for cows, and that the milk is safe for consumers, this is “blatantly false,” says Dr Epstein, who authored the 2006 book, “What’s In Your Milk?” (Trafford Publishing).
Dr. Epstein warns:
- rBST makes cows sick. Monsanto has been forced to admit to about 20 toxic effects, including mastitis, on the label of Posilac, the rBST product that when administered to cows makes them produce more milk. Monsanto’s Posilac product was acquired by Eli Lilly in 2008.
- rBST milk is contaminated by pus, due to mastitis, an infection of the udder commonly induced by the hormone, and also by antibiotics used to treat the mastitis.
- rBST milk is chemically and nutritionally different than natural milk.
- Milk from cows injected with rBST is contaminated with the hormone, traces of which are absorbed through the gut into the blood of people who consume this milk or products made from it.
- rBST milk is supercharged with high levels of the natural growth factor (IGF-1), which is readily absorbed through the gut.
- Excess levels of IGF-1 have been incriminated in well-documented scientific publications as causes of breast, colon, and prostate cancers. Additionally, IGF-1 blocks natural defense mechanisms against early submicroscopic cancers.
Cancer Prevention Coalition warnings of these risks in 1990 were endorsed by the National Family Farm Coalition, representing 30 organizations, and also by the Campaign Against rBST, representing 10 organizations.
A 2007 Cancer Prevention Coalition petition to the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA), “Seeking Withdrawal of the New Animal Drug application for rBST,” was endorsed by the Organic Consumers Association, Farm Defenders, and the Institute for Responsible Technology.
Nevertheless, the FDA has remained indifferent to these risks, in spite of longstanding Congressional concerns.
Comments
likeable answers i like it
Posted by Alewpoosype on January 13, 2010
I am reading this article second time today, you have to be more careful with content leakers. If I will fount it again I will send you a link
Posted by Bruce Wells on February 19, 2010
I really like when people are expressing their opinion and thought. So I like the way you are writing
Posted by Brendan Reynolds on February 20, 2010
I really like when people are expressing their opinion and thought. So I like the way you are writing
Posted by Carlton Rice on February 21, 2010
Post a Comment